Procurement in the energy sector plays a key role in the energy industry. It not only influences the cost structure of companies, but also their carbon footprint and sustainability goals. Unlike in many industries, procurement here is closely linked to volatile energy markets, regulatory frameworks and geopolitical influences. In this article, we provide an overview of the special features of energy procurement, address current challenges, particularly in the context of the climate crisis, and discuss strategic future prospects.
Direct energy purchasing comprises the strategic and operational procurement of electricity and gas. The central tasks include
The energy market is highly volatile, which makes purchasing particularly challenging both in terms of time and price.
Energy trading basically takes place in two ways: via regulated energy exchanges as central trading centers or via over-the-counter OTC trading.
In Germany, around 75% over the counterof electricity is still traded . However, prices are still strongly oriented towards exchange prices.
The timing and duration of procurement contracts have a considerable influence on energy prices. Spot market prices can fluctuate greatly depending on the day, while long-term futures prices offer more planning security. Strategic procurement planning therefore takes into account market trends, political influences and seasonal factors.
Indirect purchasing in the energy sector includes all procurement activities for goods and services that are not sold directly as tradable energy products but are essential for the business operations of energy companies. These include
Production facilities as long-term capital goods:
Grid infrastructure:
There are also the following categories:
The procurement of critical infrastructure technologies is particularly complex, as they have to meet the highest safety and availability standards. Modern energy companies are increasingly relying on digital procurement platforms to optimize indirect purchasing, meet compliance requirements and achieve cost savings through strategic supplier partnerships.
The integration of ESG criteria is also becoming increasingly important, as energy companies need to make their entire value chain more sustainable.
In contrast to other sectors, energy procurement is more strongly influenced by political decisions, government regulation (e.g. EEG, CO₂ pricing) and market dynamics. Purchasing also has a direct influence on the carbon footprint of companies. This is a distinguishing feature of growing strategic importance.
The energy market has been increasingly characterized by price volatility in recent years. There are many reasons for this.
Influencing factors such as geopolitical conflicts, regulatory interventions and the scarcity of fossil resources intertwine and create a dynamic that makes long-term planning difficult. This volatility affects both direct purchasing (tradable energy products such as electricity, gas, oil and emissions certificates) and indirect purchasing (production facilities, infrastructure and services), with the latter being particularly vulnerable due to longer-term investment cycles and more complex supply chains.
The price shock during the Ukraine war was particularly striking: before the war began, around 55% of German natural gas came from Russia (as at 2020). The loss of these supply volumes and the destruction of critical infrastructure, such as the Nord Stream pipelines, caused prices to multiply within a very short space of time. The price of natural gas at the European TTF trading point reached a record high of 320.4 in March 2022 (see figure), compared to an index value of around 100 before the crisis. Electricity and light heating oil were also massively affected.
Indirect purchasing was hit even harder by secondary effects: Wind farm components became more expensive due to higher steel prices. Solar panel supply chains from Asia were interrupted by energy shortages and logistics problems. In addition, the IT infrastructure for energy trading platforms delayed by semiconductor bottleneckswas . Maintenance and repair costs rose disproportionately as specialized service providers adjusted their prices to the increased energy costs. Engineering services and consulting services became significantly more expensive due to the increased demand for energy efficiency projects and compliance consulting.
This trend was exacerbated by the increased demand for alternative sources and higher CO₂ prices. The increase in CO₂ certificates as part of EU emissions trading made fossil energy generation significantly more expensive. In 2021, still €25 per tonne; today, the price has more than doubled and stands at €55 per tonnethe CO₂ price was . This was compounded by the expiry of temporary relief measures such as the VAT reduction on gas and emergency aid in December 2022, which had previously had a price-dampening effect. With the discontinuation of these measures, the consumer price index rose again, particularly in spring 2023.
This extreme volatility makes it difficult for companies to realistically calculate their energy expenditure. Long-term contracts are becoming riskier because future developments are almost impossible to predict. Indirect purchasing in particular faces special challenges: Investment decisions for wind farms or power plants with a 20-30 year term must be made under extreme uncertainty, while at the same time supplier contracts for critical infrastructure services must be made more flexible. Energy-intensive sectors must therefore fundamentally rethink their purchasing strategies and focus more on risk hedging and diversified procurement portfolios.
Energy buyers have to navigate a dense network of national and European regulations:
These regulations and many other provisions influence purchasing decisions. Contractual risks, reporting obligations and ESG compliance are important topics.
Global supply chains and critical infrastructure such as electricity grids, gas pipelines and LNG terminals are susceptible to disruptions caused by cyber attacks, acts of sabotage or construction delays. These risks have a direct impact on security of supply and therefore also on purchasing strategies.
Cyberattacks on energy grids
Thousands of cyberattacks on electricity and gas grids have been reported in Europe since 2022; the German Federal Office for Information (BSI) warns of serious consequences for security of supplySecurity .
Sabotage of grid infrastructure
In September 2022, explosions occurred on the Nord Stream pipelines, causing extensive gas outages and geopolitical upheaval.
In Germany, a fiber optic cable for the railroad destroyed in 2022was . Also a symbol of possible sabotage against critical infrastructure.
Delays in the construction of LNG terminals
The Stade LNG terminal in northern Germany has been delayed for months because the "FSRU" ship was withdrawn.
Impact on indirect energy procurement
Real-time data is also becoming increasingly important in indirect energy procurement. Energy prices, CO₂ intensity and regulatory requirements have a major impact on the selection and evaluation of suppliers and products.
This requires:
However, many companies face challenges:
Even those who do not procure energy directly are affected by its price and emissions trends. Indirect energy procurement must be integrated into digital management and evaluation to ensure informed decisions, regulatory certainty and climate-conscious supply chains.
With around 40% of global CO₂ emissions, the energy supply is the single biggest contributor to the climate crisis. It is therefore at the center of climate policy measures.
Initiatives such as the Paris Climate Agreement, the EU Green Deal, the EU Taxonomy or national measures such as the Climate Protection Act in Germany are calling on companies to systematically decarbonize their indirect energy consumption as well.
For indirect energy purchasing, this means
The decarbonization of procurement thus becomes a strategic obligation and a central task in climate-related risk management.
Sustainable energy procurement means paying attention not only to price, but also to environmental, social and economic impacts. In terms of indirect energy purchasing, this means that companies check the energy and emissions profiles of their primary products, suppliers and services.
The focus here is on
Sustainable procurement thus contributes directly to the reduction of Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions and at the same time meets the growing demands of politicians, investors and the public. It is no longer an add-on, but a prerequisite for a sustainable procurement strategy.
Sustainable procurement not only protects the climate, but also provides companies with clear economic and strategic advantages. Those who already consistently rely on low-emission and energy-efficient products and suppliers benefit on several levels:
In short: sustainability in indirect energy procurement is not a cost driver, but a strategic lever to ensure resilience, efficiency and future viability.
Energy prices are subject to strong fluctuations due to geopolitical developments, CO₂ pricing, weather extremes or shifts in demand. For indirectly purchasing companies, this means that even if they do not procure energy themselves, their suppliers, materials or services are heavily affected by these fluctuations. In order to ensure long-term cost stability, targeted hedging strategies are required in purchasing.
Important instruments here are
Sophisticated risk hedging in energy procurement is also crucial for companies that are indirectly affected. It not only protects against short-term price peaks, but also ensures long-term competitiveness - especially in energy-intensive sectors.
Companies are under increasing pressure to demonstrate the sustainability and responsibility of their supply chain.
1. environmental performance & carbon footprint
Suppliers who know, document and reduce their carbon footprint have an advantage. Particularly important:
2. certifications & proofs
Certificates show that sustainability is structurally anchored. Particularly in demand:
3. transparency & traceability
Where does a product come from? How energy-intensive is its production? Who are the upstream suppliers?
4. audits & external ratings
Independent assessments make sustainability comparable:
Tip for procurement managers Use a standardized ESG scoring model or integrate sustainability into your SRM tool. This way, ESG does not become an additional task, but part of your routine processes - and creates real added value in the long term.
Modern procurement solutions enable the analysis of large amounts of data, automated tenders and transparent reports. AI-supported forecasts help to evaluate future developments.
Indirect energy procurement is at a turning point: what was once considered an operational support area is now becoming a strategic driver for decarbonization, digitalization and resilience. At a time when energy costs are fluctuating, ESG requirements are increasing and digital technologies are changing entire supply chains, the role of procurement is being redefined.
Companies that align their procurement with foresight can
Future developments such as CO₂ tariffs, automated trading platforms, blockchain-based supply chains and AI-supported risk analyses will continue to change procurement. At the same time, the requirements for compliance, ESG scoring and data integration are increasing.
Indirect energy procurement will therefore not only become a key factor for efficiency and compliance, but also an active contributor to the energy transition. Now is the right time to strategically develop your own understanding of procurement.
Indirect energy procurement has evolved from a sideshow to a strategic management tool. Between energy price crises, climate targets and digitalization, it is becoming clear that those who purchase passively today not only risk higher costs tomorrow, but also regulatory conflicts and loss of reputation. The requirements are increasing - but so are the opportunities to create real added value through data-based, sustainable and risk-oriented strategies.
Recommended measures for procurement managers:
Those who strategically align indirect procurement in the energy sector today are not only shaping efficiency and resilience in the company, but also making an active contribution to the climate-neutral future of the energy sector.
Indirect energy procurement refers to the procurement of all goods and services that are not traded directly as electricity or gas but are necessary for energy and grid operation - such as IT systems, transformers, maintenance services or wind farm components.
CO₂ pricing makes fossil fuels such as natural gas, heating oil and coal more expensive. Energy buyers must take this price development into account and strategically prioritize low-emission alternatives in order to reduce costs and regulatory risks.
Geopolitical crises (e.g. war in Ukraine), CO₂ certificates, acts of sabotage on pipelines or the expiry of state aid lead to extreme fluctuations in electricity and gas prices. This volatility complicates budget planning and contract design.
Buyers must comply with a large number of regulations, including the : - EEG (promotion of renewable energies), - EU taxonomy (sustainability of investments), - CSRD (sustainability reporting), - BEHG / EU-ETS (CO₂ pricing), - LkSG (supply chain due diligence obligations). These laws influence purchasing criteria, documentation requirements and ESG compliance.
Digital tools such as procurement platforms, AI-supported market analyses and automated tenders enable a data-driven, resilient and sustainable procurement strategy - especially in indirect procurement with complex supply chains.
Sustainable energy procurement means giving preference to low-emission products, green electricity contracts (e.g. PPAs) and certified suppliers. Purchasing can actively contribute to decarbonization through carbon footprints, guarantees of origin and ESG criteria.
Because it has a major impact on security of supply, emissions balance and resilience. IT systems, grid infrastructure and technical services must be procured efficiently, sustainably and in a crisis-proof manner - especially in view of increasing ESG and compliance requirements.